Note: This homework assignment has been split into two parts. Part one answers the actual prompt and the second part addresses the larger issue of sharing the spoils and why we have lost that mentality. This is part one (the actual assignment I suppose).
In the article presented by Jonathan Haidt, “How to Get Rich
to Share the Marbles”, the University of Virginia professor talks about a so
called “share-the-spoils” mentality that exists among humans. According to
studies conducted by researchers at the Max Planck institute in Germany, this
mentality does not exist with our closest cousins, the chimpanzees. It developed
for us thousands of years ago when humans started foraging and hunting together
for food. Unfortunately, this mentality resides within us as a switch that is
not permanently on. The positive feelings of community and together-ness
generated by this mentality are expressed, i.e. the switch is turned on, when
everyone collaborates and cooperates together for the greater good. As the
author pointed out, throughout history we have been asked to come together, for
a higher calling than just working for ourselves. This pertains to not only presidents
like Lincoln, Roosevelt, and Kennedy but other leaders, like Martin Luther King
and Churchill, as well. They presented compelling cases why, through
cooperation and unity, we could overcome adversity and achieve grand projects
and goals. Such things that could only be dreamed about became reality. Then,
the reward could be equally felt and shared among all involved. Teamwork is
always rewarded, whether it is a team sport, or a huge project or research program.
There are some tasks that are too big for any one individual to take on alone.
In that scenario, it is always better to form a team to tackle it. Not only
does it make the process faster, but more enjoyable and easier to handle.
I have always felt that doing certain tasks as a team, such
as large finance, statistics or programming assignments, are better and more
efficient for the people involved. For two of my classes, CS 105 and Fin 221,
we had group Excel projects that we had to finish. I honestly felt we
accomplished so much more by working together. I don’t mean just the project
itself, but I mean the learning process and completing it in a timely,
efficient manner. In the same vein, I played soccer throughout middle school
and high school and the sport instilled in me a sense of cooperation, teamwork,
and working hard, but playing by the rules, results in a big rewards and
payoff. Working together means you don’t have to share the burden and you get
to interact with others, and those very human feelings are important for the
real world. So these experiences extend and translate to the real world,
especially with jobs and working in an office. Some of the biggest inventions
and products, like the iPhone, facebook, or Windows, were possible because they
were not an individual task – they were collaborations between groups of people
among divisions in a company. For an example of this, I refer you to a recent
New York Times Magazine piece about Steve Jobs, Apple, and the creation of the
iPhone: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/and-then-steve-said-let-there-be-an-iphone.html
Imagine
that, without the incredibly hard efforts of Apple employees, we would have
never had a smartphone revolution – or at least, it would not have come as fast
as it did. So yes, the conclusions in
the given New York Times article piece certainly do jive with my experiences
and what I have read so far.
I applaud your enthusiasm to write two posts for this prompt. However, I hope is not a trend and/or you write one longish post so I can write one response.
ReplyDeleteI don't believe Haidt's piece is so much about teamwork as it is about whether we recognize others as deserving and what triggers that recognition. In software engineering, you don't see a list of the various people involved in the creation process. But when you watch a movie, there are credits. You might ask why. Haidt's piece speaks to that.
No, I won't write two posts for every prompt - I just read a lot of news and politics and I guess I wanted to share my opinion on that related but tangential topic
ReplyDeleteI'd be interested in the level of effort put forth by everyone in your CS 105 and FIN 221 groups for your projects. If you felt that everyone in your group put forth the same amount of effort, then your preference for group work and (I'm assuming) preference for an even distribution of group work completely goes along with the article.
ReplyDeleteI also took those classes and I had a completely opposite experience from yours. In my Fin 221 group we split up the work in pairs, but when we came together to talk about each part and put everything together, the other pairs consistently didn't deliver - they would either not finish their part, or they would have done it completely incorrectly. I felt that they weren't pulling the weight, since my partner and I were always the ones to finish the problems, correct mistakes, and teach the other group members concepts they didn't understand. Your assumption that equal distribution of grades is appropriate and is to be desired only works when everyone pulls their weight. Unfortunately, in college classes, that is rarely the case (in my experience, anyway). I wish I'd had an experience like yours, where equal distribution of credit would have been appropriate.